Susilo v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Susilo’s accountant received Susilo’s authorization letter and delivered it along with a written request for any reinstatement amount and instructions on where to deliver such funds
• motion to dismiss 28 denied where the “only arguable deficiency in plaintiff’s allegations of fraud is that [they did] not state the names of all the individual representatives of defendants”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).