Susie Mae Johnson, Cross-Appellee v. William C. Ellis & Sons Iron Works, Inc., Etc., Long Reach Manufacturing, Etc., Cross-Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• refusal to admit safety code evidence not supportable on the basis that it was not properly proffered, because plaintiff did specifically refer to Rule 803(18)
• refusal to admit safety code evidence not supportable on the basis that it was not properly proffered, because plaintiff did specifically refer to Rule 803(18)
• direct quotation may be \more dramatic\ and \more persuasive\ than otherwise equivalent testimony
• direct quotation may be “more dramatic” and “more persuasive” than otherwise equivalent testimony
• cumulative and prejudicial evidence properly excluded
• cumulative and prejudicial evidence properly excluded

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).