Sushi Tatsu, LLC v. Benaresh

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting “[w]here there is a view of the case that makes the jury’s answers to special interrogatories consistent, they must be resolved that way”
• “Standing requires that a plaintiff satisfy ‘three elements: injury in fact, traceability, and redressability.’” (quoting Kerin v. Titeflex Corp., 770 F.3d 978, 981 (1st Cir. 2014))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).