Susan Rae BAKER, Appellant, v. STUART BROADCASTING COMPANY, a Corporation, Et Al., Appellees

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, “[i]f the challenged conduct is essentially a single act of discrimination by a single business entity, the fact that two or more agents participated in the decision or in the act itself will normally not constitute the conspiracy contemplated by [§ 1985]”
• declining to pass on district court’s holding that Section 1985(3) does not reach sex-based conspiracies
• declining to pass on district court's holding that § 1985(3) does not reach sex based conspiracies
• declining to pass on district court’s holding that § 1985(3) does not reach sex based conspiracies
• dismissing sex discrimination claim on the ground that no conspiracy present
• dismissing sex discrimination claim on the ground that no conspiracy present

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).