Susan Pedro v. Oregon Parole Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that, because parole-related decisions are not part of a criminal prosecution, “the full panoply of rights due a defendant in such a proceeding is not constitutionally mandated” in a parole proceeding, even when a protected liberty interest exists
• finding due process satisfied where petitioner was given “access to all materials considered by the Board” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).