Susan Mellen v. Marcella Winn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting, in context of discussing plaintiff’s Section 1983 claim, that defendant, a drug treatment facility, “is a private entity that cannot be said to have engaged in state action”
• “Because the District Court properly dismissed [the federal] claims, the only claims over which it had original jurisdiction, it did not abuse its discretion by declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over his [state law] claims.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).