Susan J. Friedman v. New York Life Ins. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the district court did not have diversity jurisdiction over a class action brought by insured class members because the insureds' claims could not be aggregated to satisfy the amount in controversy threshold
• holding claims of the plaintiff and putative class members remained separate and distinct claims of separate individuals for reimbursement of the amount each overpaid and therefore did not constitute common and undivided claims to a common fund
• “In removal cases, the burden is on the party who sought removal to demonstrate that federal jurisdiction exists.”
• “In removal cases, the burden is on the party who sought removal to demonstrate that federal jurisdiction exists.”
• “In removal cases, the burden is on the party who sought removal to demonstrate that federal jurisdiction exists.”
• “In removal cases, the burden is on the party who sought removal to demonstrate that federal jurisdiction exists.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).