Susan Fisler Silberstein v. City of Dayton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the federal Constitution, not state law, defines the process required to protect a property interest
• contrasting a deprivation that occurs by an established state procedure with a random and unauthorized deprivation
• contrasting a deprivation that occurs by an established state procedure with a random and unauthorized deprivation
• noting that the plaintiff bears the burden of overcoming a qualified-immunity defense
• finding the plaintiff’s right to procedural due process violated in part because the Parratt doctrine did not apply and, without reference to Parratt, finding the right clearly established
• examining whether an employee’s classified status was sufficiently clear that a reasonable official would have known that he was entitled to a pre-termination hearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).