Susan Cohn and Walter Cohn, Her Husband v. G.D. Searle & Co., Irwin I. Kimmelman, Esq., Attorney General of New Jersey, Intervenor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We cannot say that [defendant’s] reliance is unreasonable where the statute’s constitutionality has never been judicially questioned and where the reach of the constitutional principles involved is as uncertain as here.”
• “We cannot say that [defen‐ dant’s] reliance is unreasonable where the statute’s constitu‐ tionality has never been judicially questioned and where the reach of the constitutional principles involved is as uncertain as here.”
• “Although it is possible that prospective invalidation will permit maintenance of some suits that would not have been timely filed absent the tolling statute, we do not think that this slight marginal burden, if any, does violence to the Commerce Clause.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).