Survivors of Timothy Freitas v. PAC. CONTRACTORS

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the [Appeals] Board’s eonclusion[ ][was] supported by substantial evidence which [left] no reasonable doubt as to whether [the claim] was work connected”
• holding that \the [Appeals] Board's conclusion[] [was] supported by substantial evidence which [left] no reasonable doubt as to whether [the claim] was work connected\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).