· 7/28/1981
Surrey v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.
Citations
- 424 N.E.2d 234
- 384 Mass. 171
- 1981 Mass. LEXIS 1369
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “statutory words are to be given their usual and ordinary meaning considered in light of the aim to be accomplished by the Legislature”
- “The aim of the . . . statute is to minimize the catastrophic financial loss for victims of automobile accidents caused by the negligence of uninsured tortfeasors”
- 17 jurisdictions find physical contact requirement in insurance policies unenforceable under “hit-and-run” and unknown or uninsured motorist provisions; 14 courts find the requirement to be valid
- 17 jurisdictions find physical contact requirement in insurance policies unenforceable under \hit-and-run\ and unknown or uninsured motorist provisions; 14 courts find the requirement to be valid
- physical contact may not be required for recovery of uninsured motorist benefits for hit-and-run accident
- “We believe it is wholly inconsistent with this broad remedial purpose to permit the insurer to evade mandated coverage by erecting an artificial, arbitrary barrier to recovery”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Abrams, Braucher, Hennessey, Liacos, Nolan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.