Skip to main content
· 12/14/1979

Surratts Associates v. Prince George's County

Citations

  • 408 A.2d 1323
  • 286 Md. 555
  • 1979 Md. LEXIS 318

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the General Assembly intended to provide the tax collecting authorities with alternative methods for collecting taxes
  • stating that a “final judgment” is one of the “necessary elements” to trigger application of the doctrine of election of remedies
  • stating that a “final judgment” is one of the “necessary elements” to trigger application of the doctrine of election of remedies
  • explaining that among elements of election of remedies doctrine are “(1) two or more coexisting remedies between which there is a right of election; (2) inconsistency as to such available remedies; and (3
  • explaining that among elements of election of remedies doctrine are “(1) two or more coexisting remedies between which there is a right of election; (2) inconsistency as to such available remedies; and (3) the actual bringing of an action and pursuing it to a final judgment.”
  • describing doctrine of election of remedies

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy, Smith, Digges, Eldridge, Orth, Cole, Davidson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.