Skip to main content
· 4/20/2012

Surprenant v. MULCRONE

Citations

  • 44 A.3d 465
  • 163 N.H. 529

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reasoning that investigating and issuing a final GAL report are actions that are “‘integral to the judicial process,’ and [are] entitled to absolute quasi-judicial immunity”
  • applying this standard to motion to dismiss based on quasi-judicial immunity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Conboy, Dalianis, Hicks, Lynn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.