Surinder Singh v. Board of Immigration Appeals

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “nearly identical language” in 16 affidavits supported adverse credibility determination
• reasoning that “nearly 12 identical language” in affidavits from purportedly different 13 authors in support of the same application undermined 14 petitioner’s credibility
• determining that “the nearly identical language in the written affidavits allegedly provided by different people” was a proper consideration in an adverse credibility determination
• upholding adverse credibility determination based, in part, on “nearly identical language in the written affidavits allegedly provided by different people in India”
• upholding adverse credibility determination 20 partly based on nearly identical language in supporting 21 affidavits
• finding an IJ’s adverse credibility determination, which was based in part on “the nearly identical language of the affidavits ... submitted,” supported by substantial evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).