Skip to main content
· 8/31/1976

Surianello v. State

Citations

  • 553 P.2d 942
  • 92 Nev. 492
  • 1976 Nev. LEXIS 644

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding admissibility of one book due to its relevance in establishing defendant's proximity to crime scene, but relevance of another book questionable when used to show motive or intent to commit certain acts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mowbray, Gunderson, Batjer, Zenoff, Thompson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.