Suri v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the argument that the juror’s responses were equivocal was not raised before the trial court and thus not preserved
• deferring to trial court’s conclusion that prospective juror, who was challenged for cause, “did not hesitate in her nonverbal communication”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).