Skip to main content
· 9/15/1822

Surgat v. Potter

Citations

  • 10 Mart. 365

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Plaintiffs could have asserted their no-default claim and other claims as a counterclaim in the mortgage foreclosure proceeding
  • “[T]he case before us does not involve a counterclaim filed in the [prior] foreclosure action . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Martin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.