Skip to main content
· 12/14/1992

Supreme Video, Inc. v. Schauz

Citations

  • 808 F. Supp. 1380
  • 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19373
  • 1992 WL 372752

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • no prior restraint absent showing that all copies of relevant videos were seized
  • action brought under § 1983

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Randa

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.