Supreme Tribe of Ben Hur v. Cosgrove

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that, “to the extent [the plaintiff]’s claim of disability discrimination in violation of the equal protection clause is premised upon substantive rights provided by the ADA, the claim is not actionable under Section 1983”
• dismissing claims where plaintiffs failed to allege non-conclusory facts connecting bullying to student’s disabilities, and bullying may have been based on some other reason “such as personal animus”
• “Claims under Title II of the ADA and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act are analyzed identically.”
• the plaintiffs did not allege “protected activity” under the ADA because their complaints were about bullying generally and not bullying on account of disability
• “Claims under Title II of the ADA and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act are analyzed identically.”
• the plaintiffs did not allege “protected activity” under the ADA because their complaints were about bullying generally and not bullying on account of disability

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).