Support, Inc. v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of the Colorado

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• The Panel’s interpretation will be set aside only “if it is inconsistent with the clear language of the statute or with the legislative intent.”
• Panel's statutory interpretation will be set aside if inconsistent with the legislative intent
• use of the term “compensation” in the forfeiture clause of section 8-43-402, C.R.S. 2018, did not apply to medical benefits so claimant did not forfeit her right to ongoing medical benefits because of a felony conviction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).