Suppa, Trucchi, Henein, LLP v. Pyle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he Court’s review of the Amended Complaint validates Ransier’s view that it appears deliberately designed to say enough to permit (once the NGP case is closed
• good faith is not a defense to a finding of civil contempt, but it may in certain circumstances serve to mitigate the sanctions imposed for the contempt
• “Under § 105(a), the Court has the authority to use its civil contempt powers to compensate trustees for damages incurred as a result of violations of the automatic stay.”
• “Under § 105(a), the Court has the authority to use its civil contempt powers to compensate trustees for damages incurred as a result of violations of the automatic stay.”
• “Because the NGP Ohio RICO Claims were property of NGP’s estate and Ransier was settling them, he could not stand idly by once the Fulson Parties filed the 2013 State Court Case.”
• “While it is true that parties seeking to redress violations of the automatic stay should do so without incurring any more expense than is necessary ... the telephone calls suggested by Sanders and Lowe clearly would have been ineffectual here.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).