Skip to main content
· 2/15/1866

Supp v. Keusing

Citations

  • 5 Rob. 609

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that Poland’s Ministry of the Treasury was a foreign state for the purposes of the FSIA’s takings exception
  • noting that the “threshold step” is identifying the “act of the foreign sovereign State that serves as the basis for plaintiffs’ claims”
  • determining that Polish Ministry of Treasury was not an agency or instrumentality of the Republic of Poland and therefore the less rigorous nexus test did not apply
  • discussing distinction between agencies or instrumentalities of a foreign state and other organs or subdivisions of a foreign state
  • finding subsequent commercial treatment of expropriated property not sufficiently \in connection with\ the prior expropriation to satisfy the commercial activity exception
  • calling Poland’s Ministry of the Treasury “an integral part of Poland’s political structure” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.