Skip to main content
· 9/22/1964

Superx Drugs Corp. v. Michigan Board of Pharmacy

Citations

  • 233 F. Supp. 705
  • 1964 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9580

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining a “proper use” of the exception set forth in Rule 404(b)(2)
  • “A common-sense example of admissible habit evidence would be testimony that a person always holds the receiver with his right hand when speaking on the telephone.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fox

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.