Skip to main content
· 8/26/2013

Superior Trading, LLC v. Commissioner

Citations

  • 728 F.3d 676
  • 2013 WL 4505155
  • 112 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5936
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 17814

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding the presumption triggered where the partner received a substantial distribution 10 months after contributing distressed receivables
  • finding no joint business goal where one partner aimed to extract value from a worthless asset, and the other aimed to make the loss from that asset a “tax bonanza”
  • finding no joint business goal where one partner aimed to extract value from a worthless asset, and the other aimed to make the loss from that asset a \tax bonanza\
  • no joint business goal where one partner aimed to extract value on a worthless asset, and the other aimed to make the loss of that asset a \tax bonanza\
  • applying the tests of Culbertson and Tower
  • applying the tests of Culbertson and Tower

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Easterbrook, Posner, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.