Superior Outdoor Signs, Inc. v. Eller Media Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an individual was not an “aggrieved person” possessing standing to appeal a zoning board’s decision granting a variance even though he owned the corporation that owned property adjacent to the land that was the subject of the decision
• denying standing to a non-taxpayer who challenged the grant of a zoning variance by the Board of Zoning Appeals of the Town of Willards
• denying standing to a non-taxpayer who challenged the grant of a zoning variance by the Board of Zoning Appeals of the Town of Willards
• involving an complaint raised by one billboard company that a zoning act was giving a competitor with land abutting theirs a competitive advantage that harmed their business
• “Accordingly, a person is not ‘aggrieved’ for standing purposes when his sole interest in challenging a zoning decision is to stave off competition with his established business.”
• defining “taxpayer” in the context of standing to challenge a municipal zoning regulation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).