Superior MRI Services, Inc. v. Alliance Healthcare Services, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that prudential standing requires a plaintiff to assert his own legal rights and interests as opposed to those of third parties
• stating that the plaintiff opposing a factual standing challenge must prevail by a preponderance of the evidence to establish the court’s subject-matter jurisdiction over the suit
• noting that the Fifth Circuit has “long applied the prudential requirement that a party must assert its own rights and we are bound to follow our precedent until the Supreme Court squarely holds to the contrary”
• noting that the Fifth Circuit has “long applied the prudential requirement that a party must assert its own rights and we are bound to follow our precedent until the Supreme Court squarely holds to the contrary”
• “An attack is factual rather than facial if the defendant submits affidavits, testimony, or other evidentiary materials.”
• “[T]he Lexmark holding deals only with the zone-of-interests test and not with the requirement that a party assert its own rights.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).