Skip to main content
· 7/5/1988

Superior Marketing Research Corp. v. Purifoy

Citations

  • 296 Ark. 156
  • 752 S.W.2d 277
  • 1988 Ark. LEXIS 318

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • deeming sufficiency of the evidence argument abandoned when appellant failed to adhere to the predecessor of Rule 25 (d) (1) when appellant’s brief contained “no substantive argument or citation to authority related to the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his conviction”
  • “[T]his Court will not cull the record in search of error on behalf of a party.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Glaze, Holt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.