Supcoe v. Shearer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating circuit court did not abuse its discretion by allowing retroactive modification of child support to reflect the date the child’s custody changed
• “The obligation of child support is grounded in the moral and legal duty of support of one’s children from the time of birth.”
• “[C]hild support is for the benefit of the child[.]”
• \[C]hild support is for the benefit of the child[.]\
• “[Cjhild support is for the benefit of the child[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).