Suntrust Mortgage, Inc. v. Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that Georgia courts have held that suit-limitation provisions are binding
• enforcing contractual limitation clause where there was no evidence of continuing negotiations or affirmative promise, statement or other act to lead insured into believing that insurer intended to enlarge limitation period in contract
• refusing to toll the limitations period during the 60- day nonsuit period
• an insurance contract’s one-year limitation period for claims for “fire loss” was “valid and binding” on the insured
• “Compliance with the policy provisions is a condition precedent to recovery.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).