Suntrust Bank v. AETNA LIFEM INS. CO.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defendants “cannot reasonably suggest that the provision of the claim examiner’s phone number to answer any further questions [the plaintiff] may have is equivalent to an explanation of the Plan’s claim review procedures”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).