Sunstrom v. Schering-Plough Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the employer satisfied its burden of stating a non-discriminatory reason for the plaintiffs termination where the employer “honestly believed” that the plaintiff had falsified company records to exaggerate her sales activities
• in unequal pay claim, allegations relating to bonus payments and promotions which occurred prior to the date alleged as the “date discrimination took place” outside scope of the EEOC charge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).