Sunstone at Colorado Springs Homeowners Ass'n v. White

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that \the variation or misnomer in plaintiff's name as set forth in the [legal document was] immaterial\ in part because \there [was] no evidence that the misnomer ... frustrated the identification of plaintiff or caused confusion to defendants\
• concluding that “the variation or misnomer in plaintiff's name as set forth in the [legal document was] immaterial” in part because “there [was] no evidence that the misnomer ... frustrated the identification of plaintiff or caused confusion to defendants”
• concluding that “the variation or misnomer in plaintiff's name as set forth in the [legal document was] immaterial” in part because “there [was] no evidence that the misnomer .. . frustrated the identification of plaintiff or caused confusion to defendants”
• slight variation or misnomer in association’s name as used in declaration of covenants immaterial, and association not precluded from enforcing covenants

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).