Skip to main content
· 1/16/1995

Sunrise Industrial Joint Venture v. Ditric Optics, Inc.

Citations

  • 873 F. Supp. 765
  • 26 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 829
  • 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 559
  • 1995 WL 19653

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Indeed, the particularity requirement of Rule 9(b) is appropriately relaxed where the individual defendant is a corporate insider.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Spatt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.