Sunrich Food Group, Inc. v. Pacific Food of Oregon, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that, subsequent to Olech, the Second Circuit has “held that ‘the level of similarity between [class of one] plaintiffs and the persons with whom they compare themselves must be extremely high.’ ”
• affirming dismissal of claim because the plaintiff \failed to identify a single individual with whom he can be compared for Equal Protection purposes\
• affirming dis- missal of equal protection claim where petitioner “failed to identify a single individual with whom he can be compared for Equal Protection purposes”
• affirming dismissal of class of one claim because the plaintiff “failed to identify a single individual with whom he can be compared for [e]qual [p]rotection purposes”
• affirming dismissal of class of one claim because the plaintiff \failed to identify a single individual with whom he can be compared for Equal Protection purposes\
• affirming dismissal of class of one claim because the plaintiff “failed to identify a single individual with whom he can be compared for [e]qual [p]rotection purposes”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).