Sunita Patel, Kamarkant Patel, Pallavi Patel, and Kalpana Patel v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General of the United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that petitioner “did not have to acquire actual knowledge of all of the consequences of the Board’s final order before the clock could start to run for equitable tolling purposes”
• concluding that petitioner “did not have to acquire actual knowledge of all of the consequences of the Board’s final order before the clock could start to run for equitable tolling purposes”
• concluding that petitioner “did not have to acquire actual knowledge of all of the consequences of the Board’s final order before the clock could start to run for equitable tolling purposes”
• concluding that petitioner’s duty of inquiry No. 17‐2758 Page 4 was triggered when she learned that her attorney’s error resulted in her sister’s deportation order and they were both derivative beneficiaries of the same asylum application
• concluding that petitioner’s duty of inquiry No. 17‐2758 Page 4 was triggered when she learned that her attorney’s error resulted in her sister’s deportation order and they were both derivative beneficiaries of the same asylum application
• asking “whether a reasonable 25 33 Op. O.L.C. 1 (2009) (Mukasey, Att’y Gen.) person in the plaintiff’s position would have been aware of the possibility that he had suffered an injury”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).