Sung Park v. Indiana University School of Dentistry

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the failure to specifically plead that race “had anything to do with what happened” dooms a claim of race-based discrimination
• explaining that the failure to specifically plead that race “had anything to do with what happened” dooms a claim of race-based discrimination
• noting that the list of fundamental rights is includes “things like the right to marry, the right to have children, the right to marital privacy, the right to contraception, and the right to bodily integrity.”
• finding “no reason to suppose” that other dental students were “comparable” to the plaintiff where the plaintiff was accused of significantly more academic and professional misconduct
• applying the two standards derived from the lead and dissenting opinions in Del Marcelle
• affirming district court’s holding that plaintiff’s interest in becoming dentist is not protected by due process clause

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).