Skip to main content
· 12/5/2012

Sung Ho Cha v. Rappaport (In Re Sung Ho Cha)

Citations

  • 483 B.R. 547

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that testimony “would run afoul of the hearsay rule if he testified regarding the specific provisions of the written document”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnson, Jury, Kirscher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.