· 12/5/2012
Sung Ho Cha v. Rappaport (In Re Sung Ho Cha)
Citations
- 483 B.R. 547
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that testimony “would run afoul of the hearsay rule if he testified regarding the specific provisions of the written document”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Johnson, Jury, Kirscher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.