Skip to main content
· 2/17/2006

Sung Ex Rel. Lazard Ltd. v. Wasserstein

Citations

  • 415 F. Supp. 2d 393
  • 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6393
  • 2006 WL 398179

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the elements of a breach of fiduciary duty claim “are unrelated to federal law”
  • “[The] Civil RICO statute does not confer exclusive federal jurisdiction, but rather concurrent state and federal jurisdiction
  • “[T]hat the [allegedly false and misleading] statements were made in a federally required document does not change the inquiry whether, standing alone, they were false or misleading ... under state law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Marrero

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.