Sundlun v. Shoemaker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[N]othing in the parties” written agreement supports the contention that it was intended as a complete and exclusive statement of the terms of the agreement. It did not contain an integration clause that would have made such an intention manifest.
• applying the UCC to the sale of artwork to private collectors

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).