Skip to main content
· 12/4/2003

Sundeen v. Kroger

Citations

  • 133 S.W.3d 393
  • 355 Ark. 138
  • 2003 Ark. LEXIS 645

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that conclusory allegations are insufficient to create a fact issue in a summary-judgment situation
  • affirming summary judgment where plaintiff offered no proof of coercive actions or efforts to extort anything from him in abuse-of-process case against grocery store and its security officer
  • affirming summary judgment where plaintiff offered no proof of coercive actions or efforts to extort anything from him in abuse-of-process case against grocery store and its security officer
  • “[I]t is the purpose for which the process is used, once issued, that is important in reaching a conclusion.”
  • plaintiffs conviction in state district court, even'though later reversed when prosecutor nolle prossed charges on appeal to circuit court, was conclusive proof of existence of probable cause to initiate criminal proceedings
  • “In the context of a malicious prosecution action, the existence of probable cause is to be determined by the facts and circumstances surrounding the commencement and continuation of the legal proceedings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tom Glaze

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.