Sun Trust Bank v. Sun International Hotels, Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding forum selection clause reasonably communicative where forum selection clause was “set apart as a separate paragraph, in legible type” and was written in “sufficiently clear” language
• explaining that courts “look to the various theories of recovery in order to determine whether the joinder of [a] potential third-party is in fact crucial to the defendant’s case”
• listing the required elements to “pierce the corporate veil” to impute actions from a subsidiary to a parent
• distinguishing between § 1404(a) and Rule 12(b)(3) as “procedural vehicle[s] for relief’
• “[A] defendant’s home forum always has an interest in providing redress for injuries caused by its citizens.” (alteration added; citation omitted)
• “A non-negotiated forum-selection clause is not invalid simply because it is contained on a pre-printed form.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).