Skip to main content
· 8/23/1984

Sun Refining and Marketing Company, Formerly Sun Oil Company of Pennsylvania v. Pat J. Rago

Citations

  • 741 F.2d 670
  • 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 19239

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the enumerated events in S 2802(c) are not per se reasonable
  • “[W]e cannot agree with the district court that no reason can justify a franchisee’s failure to make timely payments.”
  • “[T]he Act allows franchisees to obtain a preliminary injunction upon a lesser showing than is usually required. The effect of the PMPA thus is to create a presumption that any termination of a franchise is unlawful.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Seitz, Adams, Stewart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.