Skip to main content
· 12/14/1959

Sun-Maid Raisin Growers of California, a Corporation v. California Packing Corporation, a Corporation

Citations

  • 273 F.2d 282
  • 2 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 435
  • 124 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 26
  • 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 5387

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining in the context of former FRCP 25(c) that “ [substitution or joinder is not mandatory where a transfer of interest has occurred”
  • affirming an injunction enforcing an agreement to limit the use of the Sun-Maid mark to raisins and raisin products
  • explaining in the context of FRCP 25(a) that \[s]ubstitution or joinder is not mandatory where a transfer of interest has occurred\
  • “The assignment of the trademark did not in and of itself cause all rights under the contract and injunction to vanish magically as in a puff of smoke.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barnes, Merrill, Ross

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.