Sun Life Assurance Co. of Canada v. Klawans

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Horne’s weight of the evidence claim could not prevail as “the jury resolved the inconsistencies among the testimonies as it saw fit and reached a verdict”
• holding that Horne’s weight of the evidence claim could not prevail as “the jury resolved the inconsistencies among the testimonies as it saw fit and reached a verdict”
• holding that the appellant’s weight of the evidence claim could not prevail as “the jury resolved the inconsistencies among the testimonies as it saw fit and reached a verdict”
• holding that Horne’s weight of the evidence claim could not prevail as “the jury resolved the inconsistencies among the testimonies as it saw fit and reached -6- J-S18045-16 a verdict.”
• holding that Horne’s weight of the evidence claim could not prevail as “the jury resolved the inconsistencies among the testimonies as it saw fit and reached - 13 - J-S52032-16 a verdict.”
• concluding weight of the evidence claim could not prevail as “the jury resolved the inconsistencies among the testimonies as it saw fit and reached a verdict[]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).