Sumpter v. DPH Holdings Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it is the district court’s discretion whether to review issues raised for the first time on appeal from a bankruptcy court
• holding that it is the district court’s discretion whether to review issues raised for the first time on appeal from a bankruptcy court
• holding that it is the district court’s discretion whether to review issues raised for the first time on appeal from a bankruptcy court
• holding that it is the district court’s discretion whether to review issues raised for the first time on appeal from a bankruptcy court
• stating that a district court deciding a bankruptcy appeal has discretion to review \issues raised for the first time on appeal that present only a question of law that require[ ] no findings of fact\
• “The aggrieved person standard requires that an appellant show both injury in fact under Article III, and that the injury suffered is direct and financial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).