Skip to main content
· 11/24/1911

Sumner Iron Works v. Winkleman Lumber Co.

Citations

  • 66 Wash. 14
  • 118 P. 886
  • 1911 Wash. LEXIS 1004

Syllabus

<p>Appeal — Review—Findings. Upon, a direct controversy between tbe evidence of the parties, both of whom are about equally corroborated, findings of the trial judge, who heard and saw the witnesses, will not be disturbed on appeal.</p> <p>Sales — Identity op Buyer — Evidence—Suppiciency. The sale of goods to defendant corporation is sufficiently shown where the order was given by its president, who was also an officer of another corporation doing business in the same office, it made the first payment thereon by its check, the goods were charged to it, and no claim was made until suit brought that the sale was made to the other corporation whose business had been confused with that of the vendee.</p>

Judges: Crow

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.