Summit Office Park, Inc. v. United States Steel Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Feres did not bar claims against national guardsmen who participated in a \mock lynching\
• holding that Feres did not bar claims against national guardsmen who participated in a “mock lynching”
• using a two-part analysis examining the relationship between the service member’s activity and military service, and whether allowing the litigation to proceed would actually impede military discipline
• To decide whether a serviceman was engaged in activity incident to service when injured, the court must \examine the facts of each case ... and determine whether they fall within the reasons given by the Supreme Court for its conclusion in Feres.\
• To decide whether a serviceman was engaged in activity incident to service when injured, the court must “examine the facts of each case ... and determine whether they fall within the reasons given by the Supreme Court for its conclusion in Feres.’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).