Summit Medical Center of Alabama, Inc. v. Riley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• refusing to apply the district court's analysis in this case, and finding that Alabama's statute forcing abortion providers to pay for the state's informational materials infringes plaintiffs' First Amendment rights
• refusing to apply the district court's analysis in this case, and finding that Alabama's statute forcing abortion providers to pay for the state's informational materials infringes plaintiffs' First Amendment rights
• refusing to apply the district court’s analysis in this case, and finding that Alabama’s statute forcing abortion providers to pay for the state’s informational materials infringes plaintiffs’ First Amendment rights
• refusing to apply the district court’s analysis in this case, and finding that Alabama’s statute forcing abortion providers to pay for the state’s informational materials infringes plaintiffs’ First Amendment rights
• refusing to apply the district court’s analysis in this case, and finding that Ala- bama’s statute forcing abortion providers to pay for the state’s informational materials infringes plaintiffs’ First Amendment rights
• “A motion to reconsider is only available when a party presents the court with evidence of an intervening change in controlling law, the availability of new evidence, or the need to correct clear error or manifest injustice.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).