Summit Fidelity & Surety Co. of Akron, Ohio v. Nimtz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• issuing a writ of mandamus requiring the judges to refrain from enforcing a court rule regulating bondsmen where questions of fact remain was an abuse of discretion
• issuing a writ of mandamus requiring the judges to refrain from enforcing a court rule regulating bondsmen where questions of fact remain was an abuse of discretion
• professional bondsman had been convicted of charges arising from his activities as a professional bondsman
• the acceptance and approval of bonds is a judicial function

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).