Summers v. The Oneida

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]his Court views intervention as serving the interests of justice and judicial economy . . . .”
• “[I]t is highly desirable that in a litigation between the patentee (Fisher) and a major alleged infringer (Gillette), the exclusive licensee with a substantial economic stake in the outcome (Hallmark

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).